Like the case of the brain-dead patient who became un-brain dead. Believers just said "God did it", see, plain and simple and easy. But atheists say things like "well the brain is a complex structure and E=MC2 and y=mx+b, ect, ect" Why all the complications, just come back to the side of "Goddidit". :-) ERV: DI Fellows-- EXPELLED for plagiarism::
Could you please add a big warning sign over videos with IDiots, especially Dembski? Measures must be taken before visioning such stuff, You think Dembski would come back just for students? I think they wouldnt settle for that with how much Dembski costs to Dembski replied saying that he would then post it on his blog.
http://endogenousretrovirus.blogspot.com/2007/11/di-fellows-expelled-for-plagiarism.htmlHOME |
Intelligent Debate over Intelligent Design | Think Christian::
I’m not saying anything, I’m not accusing anyone of anything (these comments tend to evoke strong reactions) but I’m just pointing out that if we read this literally (that is scientific) then we have some others issues within the text that must be reconciled in order to foster a more scientific understanding.
http://www.thinkchristian.net/?p=299HOME |
I know, like those useless weathermen with their maps and charts and satellites. I want to see a witch doctor on the 6 o'clock news, throwing bones and dancing to appease the wind gods.
I prefer to use reason and logic, life is too complex to resort to the simplistic "goddidit" excuse....by subscribing to that excuse one essentially diminishes the intellect The Austringer » Intelligent Design: Philosophical Bogosity::
Instead, the solution had to await Laplace over 100 years later, I can see someone arguing that the claim is true, since (as we atheists agree) supernatural hypotheses are false, and hence considering them automatically delays scientific progress. *; To prove youre a person (not a spam script), type the security word
http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2008/07/18/intelligent-design-philosophical-bogosity/HOME |
Fundies Say the Darndest Things! December 03::
"No duh! I just got finished saying that I thought you made a good point and wanted to quote you therefore I had to give you the credit."; - "there isnt a lack of evidence about the flood, its just that scientists choose not to acknowledge it, as it would prove much of our thinking today wrong. Thieves come in the dark of night --
http://www.fstdt.com/winace/fundies/fstdt_dec03.htmHOME |
whats the point in believing in something when theres no proof about it? if i can see something and have it in my hands able to manipulate it then theres proff, if theres not then i think it doesnt even exist!! Homo Academicus::
money that could have gone to scientifically-based medical treatment, retirement funds, mortgages, Overall, I think the panel was a worthwhile discussion, but I think that the important stuff happened despite the plan and organization of the event, If you sat on the floor he would come up to you and squat down,
http://homoacademicus.wordpress.com/HOME |
happy in ignorance.
lazy.
naive.
congratulations, you have super traits!
DOGdidit!
http://blogtown.portlandmercury.com/2007...
No brain dead patient EVER - EVER - EVER became un-brain dead
 Why do Atheist come here?
 Question: Why do christians come on here to bash atheists?
|
How come atheists have to scientifically prove stuff instead of just easily saying Goddidit or Goddidntdoit?